- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:34:29 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngETcmDuA7CuQ=Kq4eqqY_2pMvLVQpVr80Qny=Tq_HjP=8w@mail.gmail.com>
Great idea, Alastair. +1 G P.S. And as a fall back position, we could add an option to provide an easily findable "good contrast version" of an info graphic...as an alternative. My thought is...it would give designers a way to have more flexibility (if needed)...while still have a fallback infographic with good contrast...and hopefully, most designers would find that they prefer to make only one version of the graphic because it is less work. glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > > Immediately after the call I started putting Glenda’s update to the SC > text in, and whilst doing that the similarity with the current 1.4.3 sprang > to mind. > > > > How about aligning more closely with 1.4.3? > > > > ---------------- > > The visual presentation of important information in graphical elements has > a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against the immediate surrounding > background, except for the following: > > > > - Thicker lines: where the minimum width of the line is at least 3px > the graphic has a contrast ratio of at least 3:1; > - Incidental: Graphical elements that are not required for the > understanding of the graphic, that are pure decoration, that have the > information duplicated elsewhere on the same page have no contrast > requirement; > - Logotypes: Graphics that are part of a logo or brand name have no > minimum contrast requirement. > > ---------------- > > > > I went with “graphical elements” to open up the further description to > sub-graphics, e.g. a line in an info-graphic is a graphical element, and if > it is important then it should have contrast against its surroundings. > > > > As I said, if anyone has particularly good/bad examples of graphics please > send them to me and I’ll try testing this against them. > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > Alastair Campbell > > > > www.nomensa.com > > tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 > > follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc > > > > Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT > > Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 >
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 17:35:03 UTC