Re: Graphics contrast

Thanks Alistair,

That looks right.

Wayne

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote:
> Great idea, Alastair.  +1
>
> G
>
> P.S.  And as a fall back position, we could add an option to provide an
> easily findable "good contrast version" of an info graphic...as an
> alternative.  My thought is...it would give designers a way to have more
> flexibility (if needed)...while still have a fallback infographic with good
> contrast...and hopefully, most designers would find that they prefer to make
> only one version of the graphic because it is less work.
>
>
>
> glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
>
> web for everyone. web on everything. -  w3 goals
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> Immediately after the call I started putting Glenda’s update to the SC
>> text in, and whilst doing that the similarity with the current 1.4.3 sprang
>> to mind.
>>
>>
>>
>> How about aligning more closely with 1.4.3?
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------
>>
>> The visual presentation of important information in graphical elements has
>> a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against the immediate surrounding
>> background, except for the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thicker lines: where the minimum width of the line is at least 3px the
>> graphic has a contrast ratio of at least 3:1;
>> Incidental: Graphical elements that are not required for the understanding
>> of the graphic, that are pure decoration, that have the information
>> duplicated elsewhere on the same page have no contrast requirement;
>> Logotypes: Graphics that are part of a logo or brand name have no minimum
>> contrast requirement.
>>
>> ----------------
>>
>>
>>
>> I went with “graphical elements” to open up the further description to
>> sub-graphics, e.g. a line in an info-graphic is a graphical element, and if
>> it is important then it should have contrast against its surroundings.
>>
>>
>>
>> As I said, if anyone has particularly good/bad examples of graphics please
>> send them to me and I’ll try testing this against them.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Alastair Campbell
>>
>>
>>
>> www.nomensa.com
>>
>> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
>>
>> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
>>
>>
>>
>> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT
>>
>> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411
>
>

Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 18:02:09 UTC