- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:11:24 -0400
- To: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- CC: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi John, I can appreciate the value of RDF/XML for certain processing tasks, and I'm okay with keeping RDF/XML alive as a *processing* format. My suggestion to deprecate RDF/XML was intended to apply to its use as a *publishing* format. Thanks, David Booth On 09/03/2015 03:52 PM, John Walker wrote: > Hi Martynas, > > Indeed abandoning XML based serialisations would be foolish IMHO. > > Both RDF/XML and TriX can be extremely useful in certain circumstances. > > John > > On 3 Sep 2015, at 19:53, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> wrote: > >> With due respect, I think it would be foolish to burn the bridges to >> XML. The XML standards and infrastructure are very well developed, >> much more so than JSON-LD's. We use XSLT extensively on RDF/XML. >> >> Martynas >> graphityhq.com >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >>> Side note: RDF/XML was the first RDF serialization standardized, over 15 >>> years ago, at a time when XML was all the buzz. Since then other >>> serializations have been standardized that are far more human friendly to >>> read and write, and easier for programmers to use, such as Turtle and >>> JSON-LD. >>> >>> However, even beyond ease of use, one of the biggest problems with RDF/XML >>> that I and others have seen over the years is that it misleads people into >>> thinking that RDF is a dialect of XML, and it is not. I'm sure this >>> misconception was reinforced by the unfortunate depiction of XML in the >>> foundation of the (now infamous) semantic web layer cake of 2001, which in >>> hindsight is just plain wrong: >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/09/06-ecdl/slide17-0.html >>> (Admittedly JSON-LD may run a similar risk, but I think that risk is >>> mitigated now by the fact that RDF is already more established in its own >>> right.) >>> >>> I encourage all RDF publishers to use one of the other standard RDF formats >>> such as Turtle or JSON-LD. All commonly used RDF tools now support Turtle, >>> and many or most already support JSON-LD. >>> >>> RDF/XML is not officially deprecated, but I personally hope that in the next >>> round of RDF updates, we will quietly thank RDF/XML for its faithful service >>> and mark it as deprecated. >>> >>> David Booth >>> >> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 21:11:52 UTC