SW/LD researchers groking LaTeX and HTML (Was vs Re: [ESWC 2015] First Call for Paper)

On 2014-10-01 22:32, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
> Or at least is it as easy yo write this HTML as it is to write in LaTeX?

If a SW/LD "computer scientist" "researcher" can manage to deal with 
LaTeX, would it be presumptuous to say that they can probably manage HTML?

If a non-computer scientist can get a Web page up or use an existing 
bloging software/service to publish some information, do you think that 
the average SW/LD will be able to cope with that? Or are we asking for 
too much from the SW/LD researcher here?

At this point, we are not even talking about putting RDF information in 
some POSH. Lets try to get the SW/LD research community to catch up to 
20 years ago.

In the end, some people will write code, some people will use a WYSIWYG 
editor of their liking. Those that wish to use an existing tooling, can 
probably pick one at random here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_HTML_editors

Or they can take a minute to install or use a service that supports one 
at random here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems

But, to answer your question, I think that, if a Web Science researcher 
can figure out to write \paragraph, \par, \begin, carriage-return, or 
whatever ... (and, I'm totally making a shot in the dark, super wild 
guess here), I think they can figure out <p></p>.

What do you think?

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 08:48:53 UTC