- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:59:57 +0200
- To: Ali SH <asaegyn+out@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Actually LaTeXML seems to do pretty much I what I was thinking about: http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/manual/usage/usage.single.html#SS0.SSS0.P7 Could be packaged in a more user-friendly way though. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> wrote: > Hey all, > > is there any established and/or widely supported LaTeX XML schema? > > I have found several projects, but not sure how much they're used: > - http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ > - http://getfo.org/texml/ > - http://www-sop.inria.fr/marelle/tralics/ > > If there would be an agreed XML schema, it would be trivial to provide > templates for different styles using XSLT+CSS. > > > Martynas > graphity.org > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Ali SH <asaegyn+out@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sarven, great work! We definitely need more initiatives like yours. >> >> It seems to me a big hindrance to this adoption is more sociologically than >> technological. >> >> A quick suggestion - in the current thread we have people saying HTML/RDFa >> --> LaTeX - why not the other way around? >> >> Having LaTeX --> HTML/RDFa would bridge the gap. People who are writing >> papers can continue writing them in LaTeX, and when they're done, they >> simply publish as HTML/RDFa using a LaTeX plug-in? >> >> This helps reduce the activation energy for the shift for more Linked Data >> friend formats, as people don't really need to change their writing >> practices (at least the LaTeX people), and would immediately generate a >> Linked Data ready format. >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: >>> >>> On 2014-10-01 22:32, Pablo N. Mendes wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> It may help to preemptively address concerns here. Does anyone have a >>>> HTML+CSS(+RDFa) template that looks exactly like the LNCS-formatted >>>> PDFs? Can we show that papers using this template: >>>> - look consistent with each other (follow the LNCS typesetting >>>> instructions) >>>> - look the same as the PDF counterparts >>>> - look the same in any reader >>>> - look the same on screen and printed >>>> - can be read both online and offline >>>> - have the same or smaller file size >>>> - make it easy to share with others (all in one file?) >>>> >>>> Can LaTeX to HTML be achieved easily with this template? Or at least is >>>> it as easy yo write this HTML as it is to write in LaTeX? >>>> >>>> I feel like this thread warrants a "manifesto" with a backing github >>>> repo where everybody interested can chip in. >>> >>> >>> The core of your concerns were addressed over the past few years in >>> different ways on this mailing list. When some posed the situation as a >>> "technological" problem, I've created some templates and LNCS and ACM >>> styles: >>> >>> https://github.com/csarven/linked-research >>> >>> Reached out to OCs, supervisors, and authors. They all have a part in >>> this. Even wrote "manifestos": >>> >>> * http://csarven.ca/linked-research >>> >>> * http://csarven.ca/call-for-linked-research >>> >>> >>> How about we try to solve a different problem? The one that I've posed: >>> will SW/LD conferences encourage the community to eat their own dogfood for >>> "papers"? We can certainly improve on whatever needs to be improved over >>> time. The problem is that, if SW/LD technologies are not even welcome to >>> share scientific knowledge at these conferences, it is irrelevant to worry >>> about the technological comparisons. >>> >>> We have a Social Problem 101. Period. >>> >>> -Sarven >>> http://csarven.ca/#i >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,.,
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 23:00:24 UTC