- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:56:47 +0200
- To: Ali SH <asaegyn+out@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Hey all, is there any established and/or widely supported LaTeX XML schema? I have found several projects, but not sure how much they're used: - http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/ - http://getfo.org/texml/ - http://www-sop.inria.fr/marelle/tralics/ If there would be an agreed XML schema, it would be trivial to provide templates for different styles using XSLT+CSS. Martynas graphity.org On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Ali SH <asaegyn+out@gmail.com> wrote: > Sarven, great work! We definitely need more initiatives like yours. > > It seems to me a big hindrance to this adoption is more sociologically than > technological. > > A quick suggestion - in the current thread we have people saying HTML/RDFa > --> LaTeX - why not the other way around? > > Having LaTeX --> HTML/RDFa would bridge the gap. People who are writing > papers can continue writing them in LaTeX, and when they're done, they > simply publish as HTML/RDFa using a LaTeX plug-in? > > This helps reduce the activation energy for the shift for more Linked Data > friend formats, as people don't really need to change their writing > practices (at least the LaTeX people), and would immediately generate a > Linked Data ready format. > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: >> >> On 2014-10-01 22:32, Pablo N. Mendes wrote: >>> >>> >>> It may help to preemptively address concerns here. Does anyone have a >>> HTML+CSS(+RDFa) template that looks exactly like the LNCS-formatted >>> PDFs? Can we show that papers using this template: >>> - look consistent with each other (follow the LNCS typesetting >>> instructions) >>> - look the same as the PDF counterparts >>> - look the same in any reader >>> - look the same on screen and printed >>> - can be read both online and offline >>> - have the same or smaller file size >>> - make it easy to share with others (all in one file?) >>> >>> Can LaTeX to HTML be achieved easily with this template? Or at least is >>> it as easy yo write this HTML as it is to write in LaTeX? >>> >>> I feel like this thread warrants a "manifesto" with a backing github >>> repo where everybody interested can chip in. >> >> >> The core of your concerns were addressed over the past few years in >> different ways on this mailing list. When some posed the situation as a >> "technological" problem, I've created some templates and LNCS and ACM >> styles: >> >> https://github.com/csarven/linked-research >> >> Reached out to OCs, supervisors, and authors. They all have a part in >> this. Even wrote "manifestos": >> >> * http://csarven.ca/linked-research >> >> * http://csarven.ca/call-for-linked-research >> >> >> How about we try to solve a different problem? The one that I've posed: >> will SW/LD conferences encourage the community to eat their own dogfood for >> "papers"? We can certainly improve on whatever needs to be improved over >> time. The problem is that, if SW/LD technologies are not even welcome to >> share scientific knowledge at these conferences, it is irrelevant to worry >> about the technological comparisons. >> >> We have a Social Problem 101. Period. >> >> -Sarven >> http://csarven.ca/#i >> > > > > -- > > > (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,.,
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2014 22:57:15 UTC