Re: Question about DBPedia 3.9's OWL file.

You're welcome!

If you are mostly interested on exploring data (for navigators and similar
tools), I suggest starting from exploring properties usage from the
endpoint, and then analyse backwards how the Concepts/Properties are
modelled. For some use case (especially for
visualizations/navigations/let's say serendipity in general) this approach
may be useful.

A.


2014-07-15 16:22 GMT+02:00 Tim Potter <tep@yahoo-inc.com>:

>  Hi Alfredo,
>   Thanks for your reply.  Indeed I should have read the documentation
> better.  It makes sense now, although I didn't find any instances of '
> http://dbpedia.org/ontology/age' relations or a number of other
> /ontology/* property relations in the .nq files from
> http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.9/en/.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
>
> On 7/15/14, 3:24 PM, Alfredo Serafini wrote:
>
>
> Hi here is a discussion which may be of interest:
>
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/12166/dbpedia-ontology-property-vs-dbpedia-property
>
>  moreover:
> http://mappings.dbpedia.org/server/ontology/classes/
>
>  however if the goal is to find what is the property actually used on
> data instances in order to reconstruct them live, I suggest using SPARQL
> COUNT directly on the endpoint
>
>
>
> 2014-07-15 12:11 GMT+02:00 Tim Potter <tep@yahoo-inc.com>:
>
>> Hi All,
>>    I'm working on a tool for explore RDF data.  Recently I've been trying
>> to load the DBPedia 3.9 data into this tool however I've noticed that the
>> DBPedia OWL file defines some properties with '/ontology/' as the path
>> while in the datasets the predicate has '/property/'.  An example of such a
>> property would be http://dbpedia.org/ontology/age vs
>> http://dbpedia.org/property/age. I was wondering if the owl file is
>> correct?  I haven't worked with OWL ontologies much so I may have assumed
>> they are simpler than they are.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>   Tim.
>>
>>
>>
>
>