- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:52:32 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <534EDF80.4010501@openlinksw.com>
On 4/16/14 12:13 PM, David Booth wrote: > As an aside, whenever it is convenient to do so, I would strongly > suggest migrating from RDF/XML to Turtle as the default published RDF > format, for better public relations and human readability. > Historically, RDF/XML has caused quite a lot of misunderstanding of > RDF among software developers who are familiar with XML but not RDF > and see RDF/XML think that RDF is merely a (bad) dialect of XML. Yep! +1000....... Kingsley > > Thanks! > David > > On 04/16/2014 10:45 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote: >> Indeed! Well done, and deserves a matching good ontology on top of the >> cake :) >> >> Beyond recipes pointed by Martin, for inclusion in LOV it lacks a good >> old owl:Ontology element with minimal metadata, as described in >> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/Recommendations_Vocabulary_Design.pdf. >> >> Best regards >> >> Bernard >> >> >> 2014-04-16 16:36 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org >> <mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> >> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org >> <mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>>: >> >> Hi, >> thanks - well done! You could make it a little better by deploying >> the ontology at >> >> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ontology >> >> according to current best practices (HTML for humans, RDF in various >> syntaxes for machines). Currently, only RDF/XML is served, even if >> you explicitly request text/html, you end up with RDF/XML, which >> most browsers cannot handle well. >> >> Example: >> >> curl -I -H "Accept: text/html" >> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ontology >> >> returns: >> >> HTTP/1.1 200 OK >> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:20:37 GMT >> Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Red Hat) >> Content-Length: 31660 >> Connection: close >> Content-Type: application/rdf+xml >> >> It would be nice if you would apply the recipesfor HTML and RDF from >> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/. >> >> Also, as far as I can see, the JSON deployment could be improved by >> implementing >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld, >> >> as a IRI to a valid JSON-LD document in a HTTP Link Header field is >> currently missing. >> >> Again, thanks for your valuable work! >> >> Martin >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> martin hepp >> e-business & web science research group >> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen >> >> e-mail: martin.hepp@unibw.de <mailto:martin.hepp@unibw.de> >> phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 <tel:%2B49-%280%2989-6004-4217> >> fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 <tel:%2B49-%280%2989-6004-4620> >> www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) >> http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) >> skype: mfhepp >> twitter: mfhepp >> >> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! >> ================================================================= >> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ >> >> >> >> >> On 16 Apr 2014, at 15:30, John P. McCrae >> <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >> <mailto:jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote: >> >> > Princeton University in collaboration with the Cognitive >> Interaction Technology >> > Excellence Center of Bielefeld University are proud to announce >> the first >> > RDF version of WordNet 3.1, now available at: >> > >> > http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ >> > >> > This version, based on the current development of the WordNet >> project, >> > intends to be a nucleus for the Linguistic Linked Open Data cloud >> and the global >> > WordNet projects. The data are accessible in five formats >> (HTML+RDFa, RDF/XML, >> > Turtle, N-Triples and JSON-LD) as well as by querying a SPARQL >> endpoint. >> > The model is itself based on the lemon model and follows the >> guidelines >> > of the W3C OntoLex Community Group. >> > >> > We have incorporated direct links to the previous W3C >> > WordNets, UBY, Lexvo.org, VerbNet as well as translations >> collected >> > by the Open Multilingual WordNet Project. Furthermore, we include >> links >> > within the resource for previous versions of WordNets to further >> enable >> > linking. We are interested in incorporating any resources that >> are linked to >> > WordNet and would greatly appreciate suggestions. >> > >> > Regards, >> > John P. McCrae, Christiane Fellbaum & Philipp Cimiano >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Bernard Vatant >> * >> Vocabularies & Data Engineering >> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 >> Skype : bernard.vatant >> http://google.com/+BernardVatant >> -------------------------------------------------------- >> *Mondeca***** >> 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris* >> * >> www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> >> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews >> <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 19:52:54 UTC