- From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 23:14:53 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Great job! I want to stress that content-negotiation support for all types is certainly *not* a requirement for a linked data set. The syntax support or the extra header information being proposed by several members would certainly make the data nicer, as probably other dozen of other things would, but this is still valid linked data. Just because linked data should be simple ;) Thank you, Luca On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 4/16/14 12:13 PM, David Booth wrote: >> >> As an aside, whenever it is convenient to do so, I would strongly suggest >> migrating from RDF/XML to Turtle as the default published RDF format, for >> better public relations and human readability. Historically, RDF/XML has >> caused quite a lot of misunderstanding of RDF among software developers who >> are familiar with XML but not RDF and see RDF/XML think that RDF is merely a >> (bad) dialect of XML. > > > Yep! > > +1000....... > > Kingsley > >> >> Thanks! >> David >> >> On 04/16/2014 10:45 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote: >>> >>> Indeed! Well done, and deserves a matching good ontology on top of the >>> cake :) >>> >>> Beyond recipes pointed by Martin, for inclusion in LOV it lacks a good >>> old owl:Ontology element with minimal metadata, as described in >>> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/Recommendations_Vocabulary_Design.pdf. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Bernard >>> >>> >>> 2014-04-16 16:36 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org >>> <mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> >>> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org >>> <mailto:martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> thanks - well done! You could make it a little better by deploying >>> the ontology at >>> >>> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ontology >>> >>> according to current best practices (HTML for humans, RDF in various >>> syntaxes for machines). Currently, only RDF/XML is served, even if >>> you explicitly request text/html, you end up with RDF/XML, which >>> most browsers cannot handle well. >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> curl -I -H "Accept: text/html" >>> http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ontology >>> >>> returns: >>> >>> HTTP/1.1 200 OK >>> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:20:37 GMT >>> Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Red Hat) >>> Content-Length: 31660 >>> Connection: close >>> Content-Type: application/rdf+xml >>> >>> It would be nice if you would apply the recipesfor HTML and RDF from >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/. >>> >>> Also, as far as I can see, the JSON deployment could be improved by >>> implementing >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld, >>> >>> as a IRI to a valid JSON-LD document in a HTTP Link Header field is >>> currently missing. >>> >>> Again, thanks for your valuable work! >>> >>> Martin >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> martin hepp >>> e-business & web science research group >>> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen >>> >>> e-mail: martin.hepp@unibw.de <mailto:martin.hepp@unibw.de> >>> phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 <tel:%2B49-%280%2989-6004-4217> >>> fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 <tel:%2B49-%280%2989-6004-4620> >>> www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) >>> http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) >>> skype: mfhepp >>> twitter: mfhepp >>> >>> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! >>> ================================================================= >>> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16 Apr 2014, at 15:30, John P. McCrae >>> <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >>> <mailto:jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote: >>> >>> > Princeton University in collaboration with the Cognitive >>> Interaction Technology >>> > Excellence Center of Bielefeld University are proud to announce >>> the first >>> > RDF version of WordNet 3.1, now available at: >>> > >>> > http://wordnet-rdf.princeton.edu/ >>> > >>> > This version, based on the current development of the WordNet >>> project, >>> > intends to be a nucleus for the Linguistic Linked Open Data cloud >>> and the global >>> > WordNet projects. The data are accessible in five formats >>> (HTML+RDFa, RDF/XML, >>> > Turtle, N-Triples and JSON-LD) as well as by querying a SPARQL >>> endpoint. >>> > The model is itself based on the lemon model and follows the >>> guidelines >>> > of the W3C OntoLex Community Group. >>> > >>> > We have incorporated direct links to the previous W3C >>> > WordNets, UBY, Lexvo.org, VerbNet as well as translations >>> collected >>> > by the Open Multilingual WordNet Project. Furthermore, we include >>> links >>> > within the resource for previous versions of WordNets to further >>> enable >>> > linking. We are interested in incorporating any resources that >>> are linked to >>> > WordNet and would greatly appreciate suggestions. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > John P. McCrae, Christiane Fellbaum & Philipp Cimiano >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Bernard Vatant >>> * >>> Vocabularies & Data Engineering >>> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 >>> Skype : bernard.vatant >>> http://google.com/+BernardVatant >>> -------------------------------------------------------- >>> *Mondeca***** >>> 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris* >>> * >>> www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> >>> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2014 21:15:21 UTC