Re: Princeton WordNet RDF

John,

Great job!

Re:
> This version, based on the current development of the WordNet project,
> >intends to be a nucleus for the Linguistic Linked Open Data cloud and the global
> >WordNet projects. The data are accessible in five formats (HTML+RDFa, RDF/XML,
> >Turtle, N-Triples and JSON-LD) as well as by querying a SPARQL endpoint.
> >The model is itself based on the lemon model and follows the guidelines
> >of the W3C OntoLex Community Group.
If possible, it should leverage some existing discovery patterns for 
Linked Data:

1. content negotiation
2. <link/> relations in <head/> of HTML
3. "Link: " relations in HTTP response metadata.

Currently, our version of Vapour showcases some of the RDF document type 
discoverability issues:

[1] http://bit.ly/1nbZxbc -- basic i.e., leave the user agent to discern 
what it can from the data retrieved

[2] http://bit.ly/1j1bx8D -- ditto, but by attempting to make sense of 
what the URI denotes using RDF relation semantics .

Hope this helps.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen