Re: uri for uri

Shouldn't the path component of the URIs be percent-encoded? That is,

  http://uri4uri.net/uri/%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCopenhagen

instead of

  http://uri4uri.net/uri/http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copenhagen

Martynas
graphity.org

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Gutteridge
<cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of
> reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it still
> related resources together, not the identifiers for those resources. That
> makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what authority assigned
> the URI and when.
>
>
>
> On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
>>
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>> what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this proposal,
>> LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world!
>>
>> http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Michael Brunnbauer
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>>>
>>> Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many
>>> of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising..
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>>>
>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service:
>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog:
>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>>>
>
> --
> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>
> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>
>

Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 13:15:28 UTC