Re: uri for uri

Well, the colon should be.  No reason why the / should be in this case.
You can't have more than one colon in a URI.
(Though you can in what's typed in a browser bar).

Also, the TAG is going to eliminate the // soon, which will make
everything much simpler.

Tim

(hmmm ...So what would be the %-encoded version of 

http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net

?)

Tim

On 2013-04 -01, at 09:14, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

> Shouldn't the path component of the URIs be percent-encoded? That is,
> 
>  http://uri4uri.net/uri/%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCopenhagen
> 
> instead of
> 
>  http://uri4uri.net/uri/http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copenhagen
> 
> Martynas
> graphity.org
> 
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Gutteridge
> <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of
>> reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it still
>> related resources together, not the identifiers for those resources. That
>> makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what authority assigned
>> the URI and when.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Chris,
>>> 
>>> what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this proposal,
>>> LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world!
>>> 
>>> http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Michael Brunnbauer
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many
>>>> of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising..
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>>>> 
>>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service:
>>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog:
>>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>> 
>> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 13:38:58 UTC