- From: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:37:14 +0100
- To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- CC: "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>
Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it still related resources together, not the identifiers for those resources. That makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what authority assigned the URI and when. On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > Hello Chris, > > what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this proposal, > LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world! > > http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html > > Regards, > > Michael Brunnbauer > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: >> Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many >> of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising.. >> >> -- >> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg >> >> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ >> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/ >> -- Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 08:38:14 UTC