- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:52:13 -0400
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Nathan wrote: > Danny Ayers wrote: > >> On 3 April 2010 00:53, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Any guidance on using predicates in linked data / rdf which do not come >>> from rdfs/owl. Specifically I'm considering the range of: >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/* >>> >> Can't find a URL that resolves there >> > > snap; but that's what rel="edit" and so forth resolves to. > > see example: > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/selfDescribingDocuments.html#ATOMSection > > and quote: > "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be > considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/" > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt > > obviously all the links defined by: > http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml > (from the atom rfc) > > >>> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the >>> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not >>> already. >>> >>> Any guidance? >>> >> By using something as a predicate you are making statements about it. But... >> >> If you can find IANA terms like this, please use them - though beware >> the page isn't the concept. You might have to map them over to your >> own namespace, PURL URIs preferred. >> > > Would it make sense to knock up an ontology for all the standard > link-relations and sameAs them through to the iana uri's? > > Best, Nathan > > > Don't use "sameAs", this is where owl:equivalentClass and owl:equivalentProperty come in handy. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 00:52:42 UTC