- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 03:56:09 +0200
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
About time to do another rev of that thing? The social xg is having another spin, might be a good time to throw it there. I suspect most folks (yourself there mostly Henry) think this time around it should be done minimally..? On 3 April 2010 01:29, Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > On 2 Apr 2010, at 23:53, Nathan wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Any guidance on using predicates in linked data / rdf which do not come >> from rdfs/owl. Specifically I'm considering the range of: >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/* > > Ah is that something you found in the AtomOWL spec? > > Perhaps we should just give them other names, until the IETF places RDF representations > at those locations, which I imagine could take forever. > > Henry > >> >> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the >> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not >> already. >> >> Any guidance? >> >> Regards, >> >> Nathan >> > > > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 01:56:43 UTC