Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

On 2 Apr 2010, at 23:53, Nathan wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Any guidance on using predicates in linked data / rdf which do not come
> from rdfs/owl. Specifically I'm considering the range of:
>  http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/*

Ah is that something you found in the AtomOWL spec?

Perhaps we should just give them other names, until the IETF places RDF representations
at those locations, which I imagine could take forever.

Henry

> 
> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the
> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not
> already.
> 
> Any guidance?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Nathan
> 

Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 23:29:47 UTC