- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:44:13 +0100
- To: Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 01:33 +0200, Andraz Tori wrote: > also to note is that there exist proper mappings to other efforts at > tagging ontologies: > http://commontag.org/mappings The question is though, will Search Monkey, Sindice, et al make use of these mappings, and offer support for other tagging vocabs? Another, unrelated, point: it's probably a bad idea for the specification to recommend using the "/>" syntax with the <span> element. Yes, it's syntactically legal, but it breaks XHTML 1.0 Appendix C guidelines, and will cause headaches for authors who aren't sending their pages as application/xhtml+xml. Oh, one more... it would be nice if the spec had an example of using ctag:label and ctag:taggingDate on the same tag. Sure *I* know how, but I'm pretty sure that most of the people the spec is targeted at will get the answer seriously wrong if they had to guess using the existing examples as a guideline. -- Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 08:44:57 UTC