- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:51:23 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, public-lld@w3.org
Karen wrote: >There is no 'things in the world' concept in library cataloging in the >sense that there is in SemWeb. I think it's helpful to think of "things in the world" in the SemWeb context not as real things in the real world, but as things in a notional world about which one wants to make statements -- as MichaelP put it [1]: I would argue that OWL (like any ontology language) is used to create _a world_ (the universe or domain) one is trying to make assertions about, rather than just taking _the world_ as the default domain. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/2010Sep/0007.html Karen wrote: > > Perhaps I don't understand the difference between SKOS and Skosxl, but my > > reading of the use of labels for both of those is that you are providing the > > label for *something*. In authority data, the authoritative name (the MARC > > 1XX) *is* the thing. At least, that seems to be what FRAD is saying. So when modeled in an ontology or concept scheme, the authoritative name (the MARC 1XX) _would_ be a "thing in the world". Dan wrote: > My understanding of SKOS vs SKOSXL is just that in XL the content of > the label is itself a first class thing. Which can be useful when you > want to say other things about the label. So in this case it would > give a kind of double-indirection in that with this FRAD/MARC stuff we > are also applying the label to a thing that stands for a person's > name. > > So we'd potentially have > 1. the person as a thing > 2. the person's name as a thing > 3. the label for the person's name as a thing (if using skosxl:) To be clear, I understand this to mean: 1. the person as thing is an instance of foaf:Person 2. the person's name as thing is an instance of skos:Concept 3. the label for the person's name as thing is an instance of skos:Label ...where #2 and #3 are part of the authority scheme, and where #2 may be related to #1 using foaf:focus. Tom -- Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 14:52:00 UTC