public-linked-json@w3.org from February 2016 by author

Adrian Pohl

• Re: Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types (Monday, 22 February)
• Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types (Friday, 19 February)

Dave Longley

• Re: Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: JSON-LD Framing requires "@type"? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: C++ implementation (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: Opening MusicBrainz resources in JSON-LD playground (Friday, 5 February)

David I. Lehn

• Re: C++ implementation (Thursday, 11 February)

Dietrich Schulten

• Re: Example of using json-ld from Java (Friday, 19 February)

Håvard Mikkelsen Ottestad

• Re: Example of using json-ld from Java (Sunday, 21 February)

John Walker

• RE: Opening MusicBrainz resources in JSON-LD playground (Monday, 8 February)
• Opening MusicBrainz resources in JSON-LD playground (Friday, 5 February)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: C++ implementation (Thursday, 11 February)
• RE: Opening MusicBrainz resources in JSON-LD playground (Saturday, 6 February)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: JSON-LD Framing requires "@type"? (Wednesday, 17 February)
• JSON-LD Framing requires "@type"? (Wednesday, 17 February)

Ruben Verborgh

• RDF / JavaScript: first interface specification draft (Friday, 5 February)

Sebastian Hellmann

• SEMANTiCS 2016, Leipzig, Sep 12-15, Call for Industry & Transfer Tutorials and Workshops (Wednesday, 24 February)
• SEMANTiCS 2016, Leipzig, Sep 12-15, Call for Scientific Workshops (Wednesday, 24 February)

Viggo Navarsete

• Re: Example of using json-ld from Java (Friday, 19 February)
• Example of using json-ld from Java (Thursday, 18 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 24 February 2016 13:32:41 UTC