Re: Using rdf:type instead of @type for node types from Dave Longley on 2016-02-23 (public-linked-json@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:21:19 -0500
To: Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de>, public-linked-json@w3.org
Message-ID: <56CCBF3F.1060803@digitalbazaar.com>

On 02/22/2016 08:25 AM, Adrian Pohl wrote:
> Hello Dave
>
> [snip]
>
> Thus, the proposed solution is out of question for our use case. Do
> you see a problem with using "type" mapped to rdf:type?

I imagine there may be some idiosyncrasies that will need to be worked
through, but otherwise it seems like it could work to me.

-- 
Dave Longley
CTO
Digital Bazaar, Inc.
http://digitalbazaar.com

Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 20:21:46 UTC