- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:07:45 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On 26 July 2011 05:08, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> JSON-SD doesn't really roll off of the tongue... neither did JSON-LD or >> RDFa. HTML is only used because it's been around forever... but it's a >> pretty crappy brand name. Any thoughts on what this technology should be >> called as we ready it for public consumption? >> >> I was thinking: Structure >> >> "Structure allows you to express Linked Data in JSON" >> >> Yes, I realize that isn't entirely accurate, but tag-lines rarely are >> accurate. Thoughts on branding the technology so that it's easy to drop into >> a conversation without scaring Web developers away or making people feel as >> if the conversation is going to take a scary turn toward geek-speak? > > What about "JSON Plus" (JSON + Structured Data) :) Or JSON-Linked-Structured-Data. JSON-LSD.
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 16:08:27 UTC