- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:07:05 -0400
- To: Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net>
- CC: "Frost, Jon A." <frostjo@missouri.edu>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Actually, I rather like JSON+LD, as it implies that Linked Data is added with JSON, which is consistent with the SD description. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPhone On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:59 AM, "Alexandre Passant" <alex@seevl.net> wrote: > I'm a bit worried about JSON+ that sounds like "JSON is broken, let's fix it" > I'd prefer a name showcasing that this is about having JSON that can > also be interpreted as Linked Data / RDF. Actually, I like the > JSON-LD. Or JSON+LD - since that combines the best of both worlds > (simplicity of JSON, graph approach of LD) > > Alex. > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Frost, Jon A. <frostjo@missouri.edu> wrote: >> I'm not in the marketing field, but I think JSON+ is a solid interesting attractive name. >> >> That is, so long as the next versions won't be JSON++ or JSON# :-) >> >> Best, >> Jon >> >> > > > > -- > Dr. Alexandre Passant - @terraces > Founder, CEO - seevl.net - @seevl > Reinventing Music Discovery >
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 16:08:30 UTC