W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Branding?

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:07:05 -0400
To: Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net>
CC: "Frost, Jon A." <frostjo@missouri.edu>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9090E793-E2D1-4C03-AE85-F4B26E2C516F@kellogg-assoc.com>
Actually, I rather like JSON+LD, as it implies that Linked Data is added with JSON, which is consistent with the SD description.

Gregg Kellogg
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:59 AM, "Alexandre Passant" <alex@seevl.net> wrote:

> I'm a bit worried about JSON+ that sounds like "JSON is broken, let's fix it"
> I'd prefer a name showcasing that this is about having JSON that can
> also be interpreted as Linked Data / RDF. Actually, I like the
> JSON-LD. Or JSON+LD - since that combines the best of both worlds
> (simplicity of JSON, graph approach of LD)
> 
> Alex.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Frost, Jon A. <frostjo@missouri.edu> wrote:
>> I'm not in the marketing field, but I think JSON+ is a solid interesting attractive name.
>> 
>> That is, so long as the next versions won't be JSON++ or JSON# :-)
>> 
>>  Best,
>>    Jon
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Alexandre Passant - @terraces
> Founder, CEO - seevl.net - @seevl
> Reinventing Music Discovery
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 16:08:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:30 UTC