- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:46:58 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 26 July 2011 05:08, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > JSON-SD doesn't really roll off of the tongue... neither did JSON-LD or > RDFa. HTML is only used because it's been around forever... but it's a > pretty crappy brand name. Any thoughts on what this technology should be > called as we ready it for public consumption? > > I was thinking: Structure > > "Structure allows you to express Linked Data in JSON" > > Yes, I realize that isn't entirely accurate, but tag-lines rarely are > accurate. Thoughts on branding the technology so that it's easy to drop into > a conversation without scaring Web developers away or making people feel as > if the conversation is going to take a scary turn toward geek-speak? What about "JSON Plus" (JSON + Structured Data) :) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Uber Comparison of RDFa, Microformats and Microdata > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/uber-comparison-rdfa-md-uf/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:47:34 UTC