- From: Alexandre Passant <alex@seevl.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:58:40 +0100
- To: "Frost, Jon A." <frostjo@missouri.edu>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
I'm a bit worried about JSON+ that sounds like "JSON is broken, let's fix it" I'd prefer a name showcasing that this is about having JSON that can also be interpreted as Linked Data / RDF. Actually, I like the JSON-LD. Or JSON+LD - since that combines the best of both worlds (simplicity of JSON, graph approach of LD) Alex. On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Frost, Jon A. <frostjo@missouri.edu> wrote: > I'm not in the marketing field, but I think JSON+ is a solid interesting attractive name. > > That is, so long as the next versions won't be JSON++ or JSON# :-) > > Best, > Jon > > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant - @terraces Founder, CEO - seevl.net - @seevl Reinventing Music Discovery
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:59:08 UTC