Re: ISSUE-37: the Graph and Links model

El 13/01/13 01:47, Wilde, Erik escribió:
> hello roger.
> On Jan 12, 2013, at 19:23, "Roger Menday"
> <> wrote:
>>>> I don't see a need for service documents.
>>> apart from the terminology "service document", i am wondering how
>>> you are envisioning interactions with the server for collection
>>> management, when you don't have a resource that allows you to
>>> provide interaction affordances for things such as, for example,
>>> the creation of collections?
>> the server provides a well-known 'root' resource from which the
>> interaction affordances, existing resources, etc. can be
>> discovered. just like on the HTML web.
> ok, then it's just terminology. what you call a root resource,
> atompub calls a service document. it seems we're on the same page and
> just need to decide on a naming issue.


I think that Roger is not referring to a service document.

What I have understood as a root resource is something like the 
index.html page; the root page from which you can navigate through the 
content in a web server.

In our case, we could have an index/root resource from which you can 
access other resources in a server. Or at least some suggestion on how 
to name it so clients know.

Kind regards,


Dr. Raúl García Castro

Ontology Engineering Group
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 15:17:26 UTC