- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:47:51 -0500
- To: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
hello roger. On Jan 12, 2013, at 19:23, "Roger Menday" <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>> I don't see a need for service documents. >> apart from the terminology "service document", i am wondering how you are >> envisioning interactions with the server for collection management, when >> you don't have a resource that allows you to provide interaction >> affordances for things such as, for example, the creation of collections? > the server provides a well-known 'root' resource from which the interaction affordances, existing resources, etc. can be discovered. just like on the HTML web. ok, then it's just terminology. what you call a root resource, atompub calls a service document. it seems we're on the same page and just need to decide on a naming issue. cheers, dret.
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2013 00:48:33 UTC