- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:10:33 +0000
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 14/01/13 17:39, Henry Story wrote: > On 14 Jan 2013, at 18:25, "Wilde, Erik"<Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > >> >hello all. >> > >> >On 2013-01-14 14:54 , "Henry Story"<henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >>> >>The argument is that instead of having containers >>> >>with URLs such as >>> >>http://example.org/container1 >>> >>they should be >>> >>http://example.org/container1/ >> > >> >picking one over the other is a preference of the entity managing >> >container URIs and should be of no concern for the protocol (i.e., LDP >> >implementations should have the freedom to go one way or the other). > I did not argued for a MUST on containers ending in "/". > I was putting forward an argument for what types of URIs would be > better to be used by the examples in the spec. > I don't believe that the examples should be depending on particular choices of appearance or naming style. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 09:11:06 UTC