W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: ACTION-115 / ACTION-116 (proposing text for ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90)

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:58:54 +0100
Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <59BEB2A7-2F87-487C-971A-8EF139989C0D@bblfish.net>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>

On 5 Dec 2013, at 20:02, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I've been working on my actions ACTION-115 and ACTION-116.
> 
> You can find a set (should say list as it's ordered) of proposals for
> ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90 at:
> 
> * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-89
> * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-90
> 
> A few comments:
> 
> * it proposes to make a Binary resource an LDPR (for unification and
>  consistency)

+1 it's been very difficult to discuss issues clearly because we have
been missing a name for this notion.

> * it introduces the notion of containment

+1 ldp:contains is a good name. 

> * containment is not related to membership

+1

> * membership is not changed at all

"membership triples" is not change at all you mean.

> * it builds upon the new Containers, just replacing ldp:member with
>  ldp:contains (I explain the rational in the proposal)

+1

> * the "it doubles the number of triples" issue is addressed

+1 I like it that it also clears the LDPC.


> * it specifies where the triples live, including the membership
>  triples

That is great as it has been one of the sources of confusion.

> 
> I think it's now up to Arnaud to decide if the proposals can be
> discussed during the next meeting.
> 
> You guys should really look into it as soon as possible and provide
> feedback (or just ask questions), so that I can improve the proposals.
> 
> Cheers,
> Alexandre.
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 14:59:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC