Re: ACTION-115 / ACTION-116 (proposing text for ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90)

On 5 Dec 2013, at 20:02, Alexandre Bertails <> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> I've been working on my actions ACTION-115 and ACTION-116.
> You can find a set (should say list as it's ordered) of proposals for
> ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90 at:
> *
> *
> A few comments:
> * it proposes to make a Binary resource an LDPR (for unification and
>  consistency)

+1 it's been very difficult to discuss issues clearly because we have
been missing a name for this notion.

> * it introduces the notion of containment

+1 ldp:contains is a good name. 

> * containment is not related to membership


> * membership is not changed at all

"membership triples" is not change at all you mean.

> * it builds upon the new Containers, just replacing ldp:member with
>  ldp:contains (I explain the rational in the proposal)


> * the "it doubles the number of triples" issue is addressed

+1 I like it that it also clears the LDPC.

> * it specifies where the triples live, including the membership
>  triples

That is great as it has been one of the sources of confusion.

> I think it's now up to Arnaud to decide if the proposals can be
> discussed during the next meeting.
> You guys should really look into it as soon as possible and provide
> feedback (or just ask questions), so that I can improve the proposals.
> Cheers,
> Alexandre.

Social Web Architect

Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 14:59:27 UTC