W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: ACTION-115 / ACTION-116 (proposing text for ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90)

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:51:44 -0500
Message-ID: <52AB1F00.4050302@w3.org>
To: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Hi,

I have made the change to the text and examples based on the feedback
I've had so far.

Generally:
* now consistently speaks about rel="type" Link header
* re-numbered PROPOSALs as 1,2,3,4,5

PROPOSAL 1:
* formally mentions ldp:ContainerResource
* not all Web resources are LDPRs
* explicitly mentions that an LDPR does not have to be contained

PROPOSAL 2:
* fixed s/ContainerResource/hashless-ContainerResource/
* simplification of the text

PROPOSAL 3:
* light editing

PROPOSAL 4:
* no change

PROPOSAL 5:
* changed name to better reflect the intent
* the new text reflects the only feedback I had: "properties-only
   resource" became "no containment triples resource"

Example 5:
* added inlining

Alexandre.

On 12/05/2013 02:02 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been working on my actions ACTION-115 and ACTION-116.
>
> You can find a set (should say list as it's ordered) of proposals for
> ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90 at:
>
> * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-89
> * http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-90
>
> A few comments:
>
> * it proposes to make a Binary resource an LDPR (for unification and
>    consistency)
> * it introduces the notion of containment
> * containment is not related to membership
> * membership is not changed at all
> * it builds upon the new Containers, just replacing ldp:member with
>    ldp:contains (I explain the rational in the proposal)
> * the "it doubles the number of triples" issue is addressed
> * it specifies where the triples live, including the membership
>    triples
>
> I think it's now up to Arnaud to decide if the proposals can be
> discussed during the next meeting.
>
> You guys should really look into it as soon as possible and provide
> feedback (or just ask questions), so that I can improve the proposals.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre.
>
>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 14:51:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC