W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: ACTION-115 / ACTION-116 (proposing text for ISSUE-89 and ISSUE-90)

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:52:20 -0800
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF39B275D3.7637694D-ON88257C38.00816234-88257C38.00832368@us.ibm.com>
Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote on 12/05/2013 03:28:41 PM:

> For many people, the doubling-triple problem is not a problem.

And on what data is that claim based on? ;-)

I know we all at times fall into that trap of thinking that our favorite 
use case is the most general one but the track record of this WG alone, if 
nothing else, shows that the positions expressed by the most vocal among 
us are not necessarily representative of the WG's opinion as a whole. So, 
I'd like to request that we all try to refrain from making such 
projections and only speak for oneself.

It reminds me all these politicians who keep talking about "what the 
American people want" (or don't want). I always want to ask them: who are 
you talking about? Not me! :-)

> Or something in that spirit. It really depends on the use-case for
> those of us who expect to have applications with a lot of LDPRs in
> non-SimpleContainers. I'll be more than happy to update the proposal
> to reflect the use-cases when I know them. I can do it for Monday's
> call if I know it before the week-end. Otherwise, this can easily be
> handled in a future proposal that would amend mine.
> 

That's fine with me. Hopefully, we'll hear from others. I fear the recent 
high volume has led people to turn their attention to other things.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 23:52:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC