Re: LDP Use Cases and Requirements

Hi,

The same of set of changes that Steve Speicher did [1] for the spec
regarding the ISSUE-8,  LDBP -> LDP, have to be done on the use case and
requirements document as well as there are many references to "basic
profile".

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] -  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Oct/0178.html

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Steve Battle put an impressive amount of work into developing the Use
> Cases & Requirements (UCR) draft [1] and for which we must be grateful. We
> now need to get everyone to review it carefully.
>
> I know some have at least already started but I have the feeling the UCR
> hasn't got as much attention as the spec has and we need to change that. We
> really should complete the UCR before we complete the spec so we need to
> crank up our effort on the UCR.
>
> Just like we have been doing for the spec we should raise issues against
> the document that we will dispose of as a group.
>
> For that matter we need to distinguish between issues the UCR raise
> against the spec and issues against the UCR itself. Looking at the list of
> issues we currently have in tracker [2] I'm not sure this is really the
> case today.
>
> Through this exercise we need to decide whether every use case and
> requirement listed in the UCR document is indeed something that is within
> scope and that we will tackle in our spec. If there is anything that you
> think is off topic, you should raise it as an issue. Just like for the
> spec, if you're not sure, just ask on the mailing list first.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/open
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
>