W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: LDP Use Cases and Requirements

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:52:55 -0700
To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF23BAAD69.6EA5D84F-ON88257A9C.005BC292-88257A9C.005CBDDE@us.ibm.com>
Indeed. Steve Battle, I leave it up to you to decide whether you want to 
create an action item for this or not.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote on 10/19/2012 
09:01:12 AM:

> From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> Date: 10/19/2012 09:03 AM
> Subject: Re: LDP Use Cases and Requirements
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The same of set of changes that Steve Speicher did [1] for the spec 
> regarding the ISSUE-8,  LDBP -> LDP, have to be done on the use case
> and requirements document as well as there are many references 
> to "basic profile".
> 
> Best Regards,
> Nandana 
> 
> [1] -  
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Oct/0178.html 

> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> Steve Battle put an impressive amount of work into developing the 
> Use Cases & Requirements (UCR) draft [1] and for which we must be 
> grateful. We now need to get everyone to review it carefully. 
> 
> I know some have at least already started but I have the feeling the
> UCR hasn't got as much attention as the spec has and we need to 
> change that. We really should complete the UCR before we complete 
> the spec so we need to crank up our effort on the UCR. 
> 
> Just like we have been doing for the spec we should raise issues 
> against the document that we will dispose of as a group. 
> 
> For that matter we need to distinguish between issues the UCR raise 
> against the spec and issues against the UCR itself. Looking at the 
> list of issues we currently have in tracker [2] I'm not sure this is
> really the case today. 
> 
> Through this exercise we need to decide whether every use case and 
> requirement listed in the UCR document is indeed something that is 
> within scope and that we will tackle in our spec. If there is 
> anything that you think is off topic, you should raise it as an 
> issue. Just like for the spec, if you're not sure, just ask on the 
> mailing list first. 
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements 
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/open
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 16:54:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC