W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: ldp-ISSUE-15 (sharing binary resources and metadata): sharing binary resources and metadata [Linked Data Platform core]

From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 16:13:27 -0400
To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Message-ID: <CC933A53.8D78%erik.wilde@emc.com>
hello andy.

On 2012-10-04 12:28 , "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
wrote:
>>I worked on the Atom spec. And at the time I put together an AtomOwl
>> ontology http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html
>> I am not sure it is that good.
>> But it could be a basis to see how close ldp ontology is to Atom.
>I'm all for adopting any other useful technology.  That said, I also
>think container-in-containers and standardised container creation are
>import because so much is about information organisation.

atom is out there, ready for us to use. in terms of container management,
that has been left out of AtomPub but could be added (there are several
options for that, but they all have been implemented in various places,
and the advantages and drawbacks are pretty well-known, i'd say. for
hierarchical containers, there are proposals (and people have implemented
that as well), but again there's no standard. but both issues could be
tackled by extensions to AtomPub, allowing us to start from a standardized
starting point and add what we need to add, based on our use cases.

cheers,

dret.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 20:14:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC