- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:28:50 +0100
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 03/10/12 19:08, Henry Story wrote: > > On 3 Oct 2012, at 19:39, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > >> On 2012-10-03 3:55 , "Linked Data Platform Working Group Issue Tracker" >> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>> ldp-ISSUE-15 (sharing binary resources and metadata): sharing binary >>> resources and metadata [Linked Data Platform core] >>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/15 >> >> good point, and i added a note to the issue (because it seems that the >> issue tracker still isn't fixed). >> >> "This is exactly the model of AtomPub (which we might end up >> re-inventing, just using slightly different terminology and a different >> serialization). In AtomPub, these concepts are referred to as the "Media >> Resource" and the "Media Link Entry" >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-9.6). >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-9.6%29.> >> I think it would be great if we tried to build on (or maybe just use) >> existing and well-understood work, which has an associated protocol and >> media type and all else that is required to be a well-behaving web >> citizen." > > I worked on the Atom spec. And at the time I put together an AtomOwl > ontology http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html > > I am not sure it is that good. > But it could be a basis to see how close ldp ontology is to Atom. I'm all for adopting any other useful technology. That said, I also think container-in-containers and standardised container creation are import because so much is about information organisation. Andy > > Henry > >> >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 19:29:27 UTC