- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 20:08:11 +0200
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 18:08:48 UTC
On 3 Oct 2012, at 19:39, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > On 2012-10-03 3:55 , "Linked Data Platform Working Group Issue Tracker" > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> ldp-ISSUE-15 (sharing binary resources and metadata): sharing binary >> resources and metadata [Linked Data Platform core] >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/15 > > good point, and i added a note to the issue (because it seems that the > issue tracker still isn't fixed). > > "This is exactly the model of AtomPub (which we might end up > re-inventing, just using slightly different terminology and a different > serialization). In AtomPub, these concepts are referred to as the "Media > Resource" and the "Media Link Entry" > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-9.6). > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-9.6%29.> > I think it would be great if we tried to build on (or maybe just use) > existing and well-understood work, which has an associated protocol and > media type and all else that is required to be a well-behaving web > citizen." I worked on the Atom spec. And at the time I put together an AtomOwl ontology http://bblfish.net/work/atom-owl/2006-06-06/AtomOwl.html I am not sure it is that good. But it could be a basis to see how close ldp ontology is to Atom. Henry > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 18:08:48 UTC