W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > November 2012

RE: User Stories

From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:36:43 -0000
Message-ID: <df51c6d8627c9dbf1d3108346bb05b6e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wilde, Erik [mailto:Erik.Wilde@emc.com]
> Sent: 21 November 2012 17:18
> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> Cc: Steve Battle
> Subject: Re: User Stories
> hello steve.
> On 2012-11-21 08:02 , "Steve Battle" <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote:
> >I donąt have information about the Śownersą of any given user-story so
> >I canąt ask anyone directly. These are the issues:
> >
> >1) RESTful interactions
> >This seems to discuss the (desirable) architecture of the LDP rather
> >than discuss a specific application area of the LDP. For this reason it
> >doesnąt make a particularly good user-story. It might be better used in
> >somehow framing the spec.
> unsurprisingly, this one is mine ;-) i agree that it's more of an
> requirement than a user story, but it seems like this is an important
issue to
> keep in mind. however, like most architectural issues, these are hard to
> capture in user stories at all, because in the end, users don't care
> architecture, they just want to solve their particular problem. so i'm
fine if we
> remove this from the user stories, i do agree that it's a bit odd in

Thanks Erik.
I won't just delete content, but I'll park it somewhere on the wiki in the
hope we can reuse it - perhaps in the proposed LDP model section.

> cheers,
> dret.
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 10:37:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:33 UTC