- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:36:43 -0000
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wilde, Erik [mailto:Erik.Wilde@emc.com] > Sent: 21 November 2012 17:18 > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org > Cc: Steve Battle > Subject: Re: User Stories > > hello steve. > > On 2012-11-21 08:02 , "Steve Battle" <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote: > >I donąt have information about the Śownersą of any given user-story so > >I canąt ask anyone directly. These are the issues: > > > >1) RESTful interactions > >This seems to discuss the (desirable) architecture of the LDP rather > >than discuss a specific application area of the LDP. For this reason it > >doesnąt make a particularly good user-story. It might be better used in > >somehow framing the spec. > > unsurprisingly, this one is mine ;-) i agree that it's more of an architectural > requirement than a user story, but it seems like this is an important issue to > keep in mind. however, like most architectural issues, these are hard to > capture in user stories at all, because in the end, users don't care about > architecture, they just want to solve their particular problem. so i'm fine if we > remove this from the user stories, i do agree that it's a bit odd in there. > Thanks Erik. I won't just delete content, but I'll park it somewhere on the wiki in the hope we can reuse it - perhaps in the proposed LDP model section. > cheers, > > dret.
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 10:37:12 UTC