- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:42:53 -0800
- To: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 21:44:19 UTC
Hi Roger, Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote on 11/21/2012 12:34:28 AM: > Arnaud, > > I notice that your email is in reply to my email :) Indeed, but don't take it personally, it is not! :-) > Can I get some clarification please … ? > > This topic - the mechanism of discovering from a resource what can > be done to it, and then doing it - has surely to be on the table for > LDP (?) Not all the solutions require SPARQL, I am quite sure of that. > > In my opinion, it MUST be possible to build a single generic client, > which can successfully be used to navigate and negotiate any LDP > "service". that's the test for having done RESTful Linked Data, IMO. > > I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. > All of the above sounds good to me. What worries me is some of the ideas that were discussed (and the subject of that email thread actually) but maybe when I see the proposal my worries will vanish. :-) > regards, > Roger > ... -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 21:44:19 UTC