- From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:58:02 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 22:58:30 UTC
> > Anyway, I supported SPARQL on a "devil's advocate" basis (re. previous post) since LDP is supposed to be based on the Linked Data principles meme, and that meme makes an equal basis reference to RDF and SPARQL. In reality, for uptake practicality reasons, I personally wouldn't mandate SPARQL support (via MUST) for LDP. OK, that matches my opinion exactly. We want everyone putting an API out on the web to be using LDP ! Roger
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 22:58:30 UTC