Re: forms, direction, query, etc …

Hi.

Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> writes:

> Henry opened up some discussion at the end of our phone conference today, regarding his proposal about forms and query. 
>
> I've got to say that I thought Henry's proposal [1] was really
> elegant.

+1

> I also think that it is a solution for a problem that is very relevant to LDP. 
>
> If it has a flaw, it that a client needs to be SPARQL aware - which I don't think will help uptake. I made my proposal on this topic at [2]. I'll freely admit that it does not have the elegance of Henry's use of SPARQL to drive interaction from the client, but, what it does have is simplicity! It is sort of like "duck-typed creation" .... it doesn't offer anything elaborate (repeated, options, etc.) at the moment. 
>

Thanks for the reminder for this subthread which was raised initially in
the discussion about Issue-33... but... what exactly is the point that
Henry was after during today's meeting ?

I'm not sure it is strictly related to issue 33 but maybe more to other
issues about discovery of the expected POST content, etc.

Would you mind clarifying, and maybe propose a particular open issue we
should tackle during the next meeting where Henry's proposal would help
(providing that we got rid of the "opening raised issues phase" before
;) ?

> Roger
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Nov/0144.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Oct/0274.html
>

Best regards,

-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)

Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:56:16 UTC