Agreed! This is a far clearer, more researcher-friendly approach. It'd be great (as Kaz mentioned) to see this approach taken across all the various superseded and/or deprecated standards. This is probably not the right list to do that discussion on, though. 😉 Kaz, would it make sense to start an issue somewhere and work there? Thanks, all! Benjamin W3C JSON-LD Chair -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung ________________________________ From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 7:45 AM To: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: JSON-LD 1.0 - "superseded" UI on site is overly harsh and pushy On 5/7/21 2:44 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > It displays the fact that the specification is superseded but, otherwise, it > is exactly the same as before. Much better, Ivan! -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Friday, 7 May 2021 16:02:08 UTC