W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-json-ld-wg@w3.org > February 2020

Re: Specs ready for review

From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:04:07 +0000
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pchampin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Message-ID: <SN6PR06MB51673102939533C0652CBE8CB2100@SN6PR06MB5167.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
No objections here. March 30th sounds fine.




From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 2:48 PM
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>; W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>; Pierre-Antoine Champin <pchampin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Subject: Re: Specs ready for review

March 30th is fine by me too.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:49 AM Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net<mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
March 30th works for me, but I suppose that is a chair decision.

Gregg Kellogg
Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2020, at 8:44 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:

Thanks Gregg. I would still need a nod for the March 20 or 30 dates before I proceed…


On 19 Feb 2020, at 17:38, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net<mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:

On Feb 19, 2020, at 12:32 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:


I have the form filled on my machine, almost ready to go to as a transition request issue. However, some problems:

- https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/pulls/ has not been merged, and I did not want to do it myself…

Sorry, done now.

- I thought there would be a similar change list for the API, too. There should be a reason why we ask a republication of the API CR as well… And I seem to remember having seen a PR on that, too (I may be wrong)

There are changes for the API, but they’re described as being editorial, as you had suggested. The reason for republication (non-editorial) as the normative language around JSON literals was changed to reference the Syntax document.

- Indeed, a new date for crEnd must be established, although the way it is on the form (which is a bit strange) is the limit date to receive comments. I know that Ralph will be at a meeting next week, so the DD's response may be a bit delayed. I have temporarily set the date of the publication to the 2nd of March, I would propose to set the crEnd to the 20th of March. (Or even the 30th? After all, we are still waiting for some implementations and their reports before going to Proposed Rec, right?).

My implementation’s complete, I still have work on jsonld.js, and haven’t started work on pyld yet.


- There is a question on the implementation information, more exactly whether there is any change (see [1] on what we said on the original request). It would be nice if we could declare already existing victories in this form…

For my week: I am here today, tomorrow (Thursday). I am at work on Saturday, b.t.w. (at MIT with Ralph:-), so I can send out the request if I get the missing information on that day, too.


[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-transition-announce/2019Nov/0009.html

On 18 Feb 2020, at 23:21, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net<mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:

All updates have been made. Greg didn’t finish signing off on three issues, but I believe all concerns have been addressed.

Note that we need to update the crEnd configuration, which is currently 2020-02-17. I don’t see that we agreed on a new end of CR date yet.

Gregg Kellogg

Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2020 22:04:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 19 February 2020 22:04:24 UTC