Re: Specs ready for review

March 30th is fine by me too.

R

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:49 AM Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
wrote:

> March 30th works for me, but I suppose that is a chair decision.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 19, 2020, at 8:44 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Gregg. I would still need a nod for the March 20 or 30 dates
> before I proceed…
>
> Ivan
>
> On 19 Feb 2020, at 17:38, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2020, at 12:32 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Gregg,
>
> I have the form filled on my machine, almost ready to go to as a
> transition request issue. However, some problems:
>
> - https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/pulls/ has not been merged, and I
> did not want to do it myself…
>
>
> Sorry, done now.
>
> - I thought there would be a similar change list for the API, too. There
> should be a reason why we ask a republication of the API CR as well… And I
> seem to remember having seen a PR on that, too (I may be wrong)
>
>
> There are changes for the API, but they’re described as being editorial,
> as you had suggested. The reason for republication (non-editorial) as the
> normative language around JSON literals was changed to reference the Syntax
> document.
>
> - Indeed, a new date for crEnd must be established, although the way it is
> on the form (which is a bit strange) is the limit date to receive comments.
> I know that Ralph will be at a meeting next week, so the DD's response may
> be a bit delayed. I have temporarily set the date of the publication to the
> 2nd of March, I would propose to set the crEnd to the 20th of March. (Or
> even the 30th? After all, we are still waiting for some implementations and
> their reports before going to Proposed Rec, right?).
>
>
> My implementation’s complete, I still have work on jsonld.js, and haven’t
> started work on pyld yet.
>
> Gregg
>
> - There is a question on the implementation information, more exactly
> whether there is any change (see [1] on what we said on the original
> request). It would be nice if we could declare already existing victories
> in this form…
>
> For my week: I am here today, tomorrow (Thursday). I am at work on
> Saturday, b.t.w. (at MIT with Ralph:-), so I can send out the request if I
> get the missing information on that day, too.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-transition-announce/2019Nov/0009.html
>
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 23:21, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
>
> All updates have been made. Greg didn’t finish signing off on three
> issues, but I believe all concerns have been addressed.
>
> Note that we need to update the crEnd configuration, which is currently
> 2020-02-17. I don’t see that we agreed on a new end of CR date yet.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>

-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049