Re: 3d favicons

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:31 PM Trevor Smith <trsmith@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Great! Thanks, Rik.
>
> Let's move this thread to that Issue. If it feels like the conversation is
> split, go ahead and create a separate Issue for the script-driven path and
> then people can work together on the path of their choice and find
> consensus on how each would work
>

I added an issue: https://github.com/immersive-web/proposals/issues/19


> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:09 PM Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I created a github issue so we can continue the discussion there:
>> https://github.com/immersive-web/proposals/issues/18
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_immersive-2Dweb_proposals_issues_18&d=DwMFaQ&c=0ia8zh_eZtQM1JEjWgVLZg&r=jahSgznxrAL5kPgsRvs7bhKUEd9M5X0d-NE2WJg7VT0&m=RNGZ4T2l4TVS3RSg_wr91C5jjiPFGg8VanzHPrl6eyc&s=jilYruMQzbxigj-nNPMtD6npC5NDeI-3a7GQUV4s0aQ&e=>
>>
>> It seems that there are 2 camps at the moment where one side wants to
>> build upon the current architecture and the other wants to build a more
>> flexible script driven solution. Should I open an issue on that?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:27 PM Waliczek, Nell <nhw@amazon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is something that I have heard several different folks express
>>> interest in.  The best way to move this forward would be to write up an
>>> issue on the Proposals Repo https://github.com/immersive-web/proposals
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_immersive-2Dweb_proposals&d=DwMGaQ&c=0ia8zh_eZtQM1JEjWgVLZg&r=jahSgznxrAL5kPgsRvs7bhKUEd9M5X0d-NE2WJg7VT0&m=IHxKbziTOHAqPbdgA6_-VEyszxOKo-r7DJ1_alMyVxg&s=PCCWIJzVu9w36Z6EfnFY18NFKC_9kiZxmBrOqWqduZA&e=>
>>> .  The write-up should have a clear description of the problem and a rough
>>> idea of how you’re thinking about trying to solve it.  A few paragraphs is
>>> more than sufficient; no need for a full explainer or idl of any sort yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Another company will need to respond to the issue to say they’re
>>> interested in collaborating on design with intent to implement if agreement
>>> can be reached.  Initial design work can start in the issue, and, when
>>> ready, Trevor will open up a repo in the Immersive Web GitHub organization
>>> for you to start iterating on the design in more detail.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’m very excited that Magic Leap is seriously considering participating
>>> in standards design rather than taking an approach that would run the risk
>>> of fracturing the Immersive Web 😊
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com>
>>> *Date: *Friday, August 17, 2018 at 3:34 PM
>>> *To: *"public-immersive-web@w3.org" <public-immersive-web@w3.org>
>>> *Subject: *3d favicons
>>> *Resent-From: *<public-immersive-web@w3.org>
>>> *Resent-Date: *Friday, August 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We're interested in coming up with a standardized way of supporting 3D
>>> favicons so a website can have a 2D and a 3D icon.
>>>
>>> Helio [1] already implemented some support but we want to have a
>>> standardized solution that incorporates everyone's input.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is anyone else interested in pursuing this?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1: https://www.magicleap.com/experiences/helio
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Trevor F. Smith
> Reality Research Engineer
> Emerging Technologies @ Mozilla
> trsmith@mozilla.com
>