- From: Trevor Smith <trsmith@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 13:29:19 -0700
- To: public-immersive-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALSfuvtj0D=raGKKQUTh4jFWBZEr=_hgzRwQrr3UZC04TtRBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Great! Thanks, Rik. Let's move this thread to that Issue. If it feels like the conversation is split, go ahead and create a separate Issue for the script-driven path and then people can work together on the path of their choice and find consensus on how each would work. On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:09 PM Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com> wrote: > I created a github issue so we can continue the discussion there: > https://github.com/immersive-web/proposals/issues/18 > > It seems that there are 2 camps at the moment where one side wants to > build upon the current architecture and the other wants to build a more > flexible script driven solution. Should I open an issue on that? > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:27 PM Waliczek, Nell <nhw@amazon.com> wrote: > >> This is something that I have heard several different folks express >> interest in. The best way to move this forward would be to write up an >> issue on the Proposals Repo https://github.com/immersive-web/proposals >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_immersive-2Dweb_proposals&d=DwMGaQ&c=0ia8zh_eZtQM1JEjWgVLZg&r=jahSgznxrAL5kPgsRvs7bhKUEd9M5X0d-NE2WJg7VT0&m=IHxKbziTOHAqPbdgA6_-VEyszxOKo-r7DJ1_alMyVxg&s=PCCWIJzVu9w36Z6EfnFY18NFKC_9kiZxmBrOqWqduZA&e=> >> . The write-up should have a clear description of the problem and a rough >> idea of how you’re thinking about trying to solve it. A few paragraphs is >> more than sufficient; no need for a full explainer or idl of any sort yet. >> >> >> >> Another company will need to respond to the issue to say they’re >> interested in collaborating on design with intent to implement if agreement >> can be reached. Initial design work can start in the issue, and, when >> ready, Trevor will open up a repo in the Immersive Web GitHub organization >> for you to start iterating on the design in more detail. >> >> >> >> I’m very excited that Magic Leap is seriously considering participating >> in standards design rather than taking an approach that would run the risk >> of fracturing the Immersive Web 😊 >> >> >> >> Nell >> >> >> >> *From: *Rik Cabanier <rcabanier@magicleap.com> >> *Date: *Friday, August 17, 2018 at 3:34 PM >> *To: *"public-immersive-web@w3.org" <public-immersive-web@w3.org> >> *Subject: *3d favicons >> *Resent-From: *<public-immersive-web@w3.org> >> *Resent-Date: *Friday, August 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM >> >> >> >> All, >> >> >> >> We're interested in coming up with a standardized way of supporting 3D >> favicons so a website can have a 2D and a 3D icon. >> >> Helio [1] already implemented some support but we want to have a >> standardized solution that incorporates everyone's input. >> >> >> >> Is anyone else interested in pursuing this? >> >> >> >> Rik >> >> >> >> 1: https://www.magicleap.com/experiences/helio >> > -- Trevor F. Smith Reality Research Engineer Emerging Technologies @ Mozilla trsmith@mozilla.com
Received on Monday, 20 August 2018 20:29:55 UTC