- From: Andrew West <andrewcwest@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:42:50 +0000
- To: "Badral S." <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALgEMhz60o7OQxZp=aK4b=x0AbrMO45MruEe_LixZtBKB=zWsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Badral, Thank you for your clarification. I think that defining a new FVS for it will be a very good idea. Best Regards, Andrew On 21 December 2015 at 11:39, Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com> wrote: > Dear Andrew, > If I understood right, this form will added with new FVS sequence. > As already discussed under > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0052.html > this form is popular in Mongolia. > As Siqin's answer, this form doesn't exist in inner Mongolia. ( > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0059.html) > Thus, it is probably not considered in Chinese Standards. > > Badral > > On 21.12.2015 12:20, Andrew West wrote: > > Dear Greg, > > Thank you for the prompt response, I am glad that it has already been > testified by others. What is the proposed solution? Will new FVS > sequences be proposed? Or are you waiting to see what the new Chinese > Standard has to say? > > Andrew > > > On 21 December 2015 at 11:08, Greg Eck <greck@postone.net> wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> >> >> Yes, I believe both Badral and Siqin have testified to this occurrence >> also. Good to see it further substantiated. It will be on the font >> comparator site soon. I have it catalogued on the DS01 also. >> >> [image: >> imap://badral%2Ebolorsoft@mail.bolorsoft.com:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E5829?header=quotebody&part=1.2&filename=image001.png] >> >> Thanks for the input, >> Greg >> >> PS The U+1826 counterpart is also catalogued. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Andrew West [mailto:andrewcwest@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Monday, December 21, 2015 6:26 PM >> *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org >> *Subject:* Dotted u and ü >> >> >> >> Dear experts, >> >> >> >> A friend of mine at the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts in St >> Petersburg is working on a catalogue of materials brought back from Beijing >> in 1926 by B. Ya. Vladimirtsov. He is having difficulty representing some >> of the Mongolian text in Unicode, in particular most books published by the >> publishing house 蒙文書社 (mongγol bičig-ün qoriy-a) use a dotted form of >> the letters u and ü when acting as a genitive particle. This dotted u/ü >> can also be found in some earlier printed books as well. I attach a table >> from his catalogue showing the word man-u ᠮᠠᠨ ᠤ and egünü ᠡᠭᠦᠨᠦ with >> dotted u and ü, and some more exampes from 蒙漢 合璧無方元音 published in 1917. >> >> >> >> [image: >> imap://badral%2Ebolorsoft@mail.bolorsoft.com:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E5829?header=quotebody&part=1.4&filename=image002.jpg] >> >> >> [image: >> imap://badral%2Ebolorsoft@mail.bolorsoft.com:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E5829?header=quotebody&part=1.3&filename=image003.jpg] >> >> >> >> >> Is anyone familiar with this usage? How can the dotted u and ü be >> represented in Unicode? My apologies if this has already been discussed on >> this list, but with so many emails I may have missed the relevant posts. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> Andrew >> > > > > -- > Badral Sanlig, Software architectwww.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net > Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar > >
Attachments
Received on Monday, 21 December 2015 11:43:39 UTC