Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants

Hi Greg, Andrew, Richards and all,
Please see the chapter "3. The Variant Forms" on page 12-16 just one 
time again. I already marked some points. We may disregard GA because it 
is not explicitly defined in the mapping table. DA and NA are already 
defined explicit.
Should we hold TR170 and correct and improve it or should we blame and 
refuse and ignore it?
I tend to think, we need to decide now, either we take TR170 or throw it 
into the bin.


Badral Sanlig, Software architect |
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar

Received on Saturday, 21 November 2015 11:23:34 UTC