- From: Badral S. <badral@bolorsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:15:49 +0100
- To: jrmt@almas.co.jp, public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
- Message-ID: <564F0EF5.4080003@bolorsoft.com>
Hi all, I sent my last email to hurried. The mapping table is at page 13 and descriptions are at page 14 and relevant characters are marked as yellow. Jirimutu: What could be first medial for DA, if second medial form https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1833m.pngis ? It's not hard to find even for foreigner. Badral On 20.11.2015 13:04, jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote: > > Badral, > > Ok. It is first time we have heard from you about the standard of > Mongolia. > > I saw you provided the presentation character set naming, not the > mapping table. > > But when I checked the presentation character set, you have marked as > three character for me with Yellow. > > But I find the Yellow marked line > > 1.The NA FIRST MEDIAL FORM - > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1828m1.png is same with > what you are saying. > > 2.The QA SECOND MEDIAL FORM - > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/182Cm1.png is not same with > what you were saying before. and you say now GA is not explicitly > defined in report 170 > > 3.The SECOND MEDIAL FORM - > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1833m.png is same with what > you are saying. But did you find another one form FIRST MEDIAL FORM in > the character set ? > > Actually, we cannot rely on this table to decide the mapping. Because > in this table, one glyph (one presentation form) have only one occurrence. > > For example, there are only one > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1820m.pngfor all medial > form of A, E, NA in this character set. > > For this reason, it cannot be the reliable document part. > > Please check the real mapping part of the TR170 attached P5 for NA, P6 > for GA, P8 for DA in AppendixA.pdf . > > I am assuming we are refereeing same version. > > If the standard is different with this TR170, please provide us the > PDF if possible. > > I would like to know how it had been corrected the TR170 to Standard > of Mongolia in the year 2000. > > It is not same with your declaration I find. > > Regards, > > Jirimutu > > =============================================================== > > Almas Inc. > > 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo > > E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : 090-6174-6115 > > Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 > > http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ > > http://www.mongolfont.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd. > > 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng > District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia > > Mail: jirimutu@delehi.com <mailto:jirimutu@delehi.com> Mobile:18647152148 > > Phone: +86-471-6661969, Ofiice:+86-471-6661995 > > http://www.delehi.com/ > > =============================================================== > > *From:*Badral S. [mailto:badral@bolorsoft.com] > *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2015 8:12 PM > *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants > > Hi Jirimutu, Greg and all, > I just want to answer following most important question from Jirimutu. > All other issues are more technical and absolutely possible and not > hard to solve by OT rules. > > Do we really need this changes ? I don’t know which documentation are > referring to creating your fonts. > > I think it should be the TR170 or updated version of the document you > are referring. This document is listing all of these character’s first > medial form and second medial same with NP. > > We hold TR 170 and MNS 4932:2000 which is almost same as Unicode to > create our fonts! We have to hold it. > At the creation time (year 2000) of Mongolian script font there exists > no document except MNS4932:2000 and technical report 170. We all know, > report 170 is not perfect and has some troubles but not for above > mentioned characters. Until now, there exist no internationally > accepted document except report 170. > Goto page 13 and see decimal #044 for DA. > Goto page 13 and see decimal #020 for NA. > GA is not explicitly defined in report 170. But you read carefully > then you can find it on page 16-17 at an example. The second medial > form of QA is same as first medial form of GA. > If you don't agree with GA, I am nothing against it. But for DA and NA > we all have to respect Unicode standard. > > Badral > > On 20.11.2015 06:04, jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi Badral and Greg > > >The "separated medial form" is not my term. I don't know what it means. > >This term has been appeared in Jirimutu's email. > > Yes, it is what I am mentioned in my mail. > > It is mean that if we list the individual medial form of the > character in textbook, grammar book or in the > > Technical document related with the encoding or some other > information technology, > > We can not display all the medial form of these character without > FVS. > > In this case if two parties using different definition of the FVS > that will cause problem. > > I was trying to persuade myself to accept Badral’s insistence if > its impaction is limited in the range of the usage mentioned above. > > But after thinking over the encoding, there are exists following > side effect actually. > > I think Badral should help Greg to solve the side effect before > update the NP list. > > 1.For NA medial form change request, > > It will impact the Greg’s over-riding rule and over-riding glyph > selection. If the dotted medial form of NA > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1828m1.pngcomes as > first medial form ( default form ), > > The over-riding medial form (third form) should become the default > form with the dotted medial form > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1828m1.png. > > In this case, the over-riding rule as well as example words all > become different completely. > > You have to help Greg to re-verify the over-riding rule and > provide plenty of examples to prove it is workable. > > 2.For GA medial form change request, > > It will impact the Greg’s over-riding rule and over-riding glyph > selection too. If the dotted masculine medial form of GA > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/182Cm1.pngcomes as > first medial form ( default form ), > > The over-riding masculine medial form (third form) should become > the default form with the dotted masculine medial > formhttps://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/182Cm1.png. > > In this case, the over-riding rule as well as example words all > become different completely. > > You have to help Greg to re-verify the over-riding rule and > provide plenty of examples to prove it is workable. > > 3.For DA medial form change request, > > If you change the medial form of DA > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1833s.png to first > medial form (default form) of DA, you have to consider additional > over-riding rule for this character. > > Because current first medial form of DA > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1833m.png, have no > tradition to use before vowel. In this reason, we don’t need to > over-ride it. > > But if you change the default medial form of DA to > https://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/v/1833s.png, we have > example word using this medial form before consonant. For example, > ᠡᠳ᠋ᠯᠡᠯ etc. > > > > You say your font is stable now and you don’t want to change the > logic of your font. But if you are refereeing, TR170 to create > your fonts, > > is it just your mistake or preference to encode your font > different with all of the documents ? > > > > I do not want to say that it is not the reason of any change > request because they already have stable fonts in hand. I think > all of font maker have their own stable font in their hands. > > This forum is for stabilizing of the entire Mongolian Font > Encoding internationally in the standard base. We should follow > after the standard come to the conclusion. > > I would like to ask Badral how do you handling the word ᠡᠳ᠋ᠯᠡᠯin > your current existing font ? maybe you are handle it as one > special spelling ? > > or you are not handling it at all. > > It is my first time to considering in this direction, We can not > include any design bug when we propose any kind of proposal. > > Thanks and regards, > > Jirimutu > > =============================================================== > > Almas Inc. > > 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo > > E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp <mailto:jrmt@almas.co.jp> Mobile : > 090-6174-6115 > > Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 > > http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ > > http://www.mongolfont.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd. > > 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street > XinCheng District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia > > Mail: jirimutu@delehi.com <mailto:jirimutu@delehi.com> > Mobile:18647152148 > > Phone: +86-471-6661969, Ofiice:+86-471-6661995 > > http://www.delehi.com/ > > =============================================================== > > *From:*Badral S. [mailto:badral@bolorsoft.com] > *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2015 1:03 AM > *To:* public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org > <mailto:public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants > > Hi Greg, > The "separated medial form" is not my term. I don't know what it > means. > This term has been appeared in Jirimutu's email. > > Badral > > On 19.11.2015 15:59, Greg Eck wrote: > > Hi Badral, > > Can you give an image of the “separated medial form” so that > we are crystal clear on which glyph we are talking about? > > I am not sure what this is referring to. > > Thanks, > Greg > > >>>>> > > *Sent:*Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:31 PM > *Subject:* Re: Issues with DA,NA,GA default medial variants > > We have decided, that we don't change our implementation (BS > column) of medial default form of DA, NA, GA due to following > reasons. > 1. Logic and Ambiguation > I already mentioned the representation logic in my previous > emails. Now plus: > NA is distinguished only by dot from A. > GA is distinguished only by dot from QA. > DA is distinguished only by horizontal tie from TA. > > 2. Established almost no destabilization > As Jirimutu described there exist almost no destabilization > because no FVSs stored in middle of a word. > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0123.html > (cutting: > > Actually we are not typing and storing FVS1 in the complete > Mongolian Word actually, > > It is automatically been selecting correct display form in the > word. > > Only when we show the separated Medial Form individually, the > FVS1 is necessary. > > For this reason, maybe you are misunderstanding the encodings. > > ) > I didn't understand what is the separated Medial Form. If it's > not ISOLATED one, then we should use ZWJ or? > In our stem database, there exist no stem in middle form of > DA, NA, GA with FVSx. The most words in Greg's example are > initial DA which is also stored in our DB with FVS1 except > suffixes. (Dun and Dugnelt stored in our DB also with FVS > because it's an initial second form of DA.) > I think, the misunderstanding was established by magic of OT > grammar. The actual problem could be just changing OT grammar > rules for font developers. If someone has difficulties, we are > ready to help. > Can you accept it Jirimutu? > > Greg: Please accept and update your NP column as we requested > unless you have contra arguments. > > cheers, > Badral > >>>>> > > > > > > -- > > Badral Sanlig, Software architect > > www.bolorsoft.com <http://www.bolorsoft.com> | www.badral.net > <http://www.badral.net> > > Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar > > > > > -- > Badral Sanlig, Software architect > www.bolorsoft.com <http://www.bolorsoft.com> | www.badral.net > <http://www.badral.net> > Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar -- Badral Sanlig, Software architect www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar
Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 12:16:29 UTC