Re: U+1824 & U+1826

Hi Greg,
The dot take place on the U/UE not on the NA.

Badral

On 14.11.2015 14:39, Greg Eck wrote:
>
> Badral, Siqin,
>
> Does the dot on the U/UE take the place of the dot on the N?
>
> Then we need some sort of mechanism/logic to remove the normal dot on 
> the N …
>
> Greg
>
> **
>
> *>>>>>
> Sent:*Saturday, November 14, 2015 8:25 PM
> *Subject:* RE: U+1824 & U+1826
>
> We have three parties that are verifying the existence of the dotted 
> U/UE in the post-NNBSP position functioning as a genitive suffix marker.
>
> We can add the 1824 as a Fourth Isolate Form, but we need a Fifth 
> Isolate Form to add the 1826.
>
> *Do we use VS1 (U+FE00) for the 1826 Fifth Isolate?*
>
> *Siqin, could you still go ahead with those two items mentioned 
> earlier (the translation and the higher resolution scan) so that we 
> can have it in our records?*
>
> *Are there other items that I am forgetting?*
>
> Greg
>
> >>>>>
>
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:06 PM
> Subject: Re: U+1824 & U+1826
>
> I requested it early enough. Could you recognize it under 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-mongolian/2015OctDec/0052.html
>
> It is not just historical reason. It's not pre-classical form. Some 
> few teacher, who apparently high qualified, still today teaches 
> genitive case with this form in Mongolia.
>
> Badral
>
> >>>>>
>


-- 
Badral Sanlig, Software architect
www.bolorsoft.com | www.badral.net
Bolorsoft LLC, Selbe Khotkhon 40/4 D2, District 11, Ulaanbaatar