Re: U+1824 & U+1826

Hi Greg,

I found sample of genetive dotted U+1824 and U+1826 in old mongolian 
document.
     u_ue_with_dot_11.jpg
     u_ue_with_dot_12.jpg
     u_ue_with_dot_13.jpg
     u_ue_with_dot_14.jpg
     u_ue_with_dot_15.jpg

I also received request from Professor Kuribayashi about dotted U+1824 
and U+1826 with NNBSP.
     request_from_kuribayashi.jpg

So, it is better to have a dotted Isolate U+1824 and U+1826, I think.

SiqinBilige

On 2015/10/16 10:32, jrmt@almas.co.jp wrote:
> Hi Badral
>
> The U+1824 & U+1826 with dotted final form is not popular usage in Inner
> Mongolia.
> I have heard that it is occurred in some historical material from linguistic
> experts.
> It is existed in the earlier proposals and I am not sure when it is
> disappeared from major list like Professor Quejingzhabu's book and GB26226
> etc.
>
> We have implemented in our font as U+1826+FVS2, if it is necessary, it is
> better to add in encoding.
>
> Thanks and best Regards
>
> Jirimutu
> ===============================================================
> Almas Inc.
> 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
> E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp   Mobile : 090-6174-6115
> Phone : 03-5688-2081,   Fax : 03-5688-2082
> http://www.almas.co.jp/   http://www.compiere-japan.com/
> http://www.mongolfont.com/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd.
> 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng
> District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia
> Mail:  jirimutu@delehi.com       Mobile:18647152148
> Phone:  +86-471-6661969,      Ofiice： +86-471-6661995
> http://www.delehi.com/
> ===============================================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Badral S. [mailto:badral@bolorsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 7:52 PM
> To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org
> Subject: U+1824 & U+1826
>
> Hi Greg,
> I just checked http://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/variants again and
> found an issue at U+1824/1826.
> If we should filter FVS-s strictly, then we should probably consider u & ue
> with drop which occurs after NA alternatively.
> @Siqin & Jirumutu: Is this form exists in Inner Mongolia? If yes, how
> popular is it?
>
> Badral
>
>
>
>