- From: <jrmt@almas.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:32:52 +0900
- To: "'Badral S.'" <badral@bolorsoft.com>, <public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org>
Hi Badral The U+1824 & U+1826 with dotted final form is not popular usage in Inner Mongolia. I have heard that it is occurred in some historical material from linguistic experts. It is existed in the earlier proposals and I am not sure when it is disappeared from major list like Professor Quejingzhabu's book and GB26226 etc. We have implemented in our font as U+1826+FVS2, if it is necessary, it is better to add in encoding. Thanks and best Regards Jirimutu =============================================================== Almas Inc. 101-0021 601 Nitto-Bldg, 6-15-11, Soto-Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo E-Mail: jrmt@almas.co.jp Mobile : 090-6174-6115 Phone : 03-5688-2081, Fax : 03-5688-2082 http://www.almas.co.jp/ http://www.compiere-japan.com/ http://www.mongolfont.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------- Inner Mongolia Delehi Information Technology Co. Ltd. 010010 13th floor of Uiles Hotel, No 89 XinHua east street XinCheng District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Mail: jirimutu@delehi.com Mobile:18647152148 Phone: +86-471-6661969, Ofiice: +86-471-6661995 http://www.delehi.com/ =============================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Badral S. [mailto:badral@bolorsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 7:52 PM To: public-i18n-mongolian@w3.org Subject: U+1824 & U+1826 Hi Greg, I just checked http://r12a.github.io/scripts/mongolian/variants again and found an issue at U+1824/1826. If we should filter FVS-s strictly, then we should probably consider u & ue with drop which occurs after NA alternatively. @Siqin & Jirumutu: Is this form exists in Inner Mongolia? If yes, how popular is it? Badral
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 01:33:32 UTC